CR230 X-10 Repeater
The whole-house X-10 blocker/passive coupler that I have used for
years works well, but there are one or two outlets in the house where
communication could be improved. I decided to install an active
repeater to address this problem and purchased one from Worthington for $85.00. I
installed the unit into the wall of my utility room from where all the
wiring in the home originates, and where the breaker panel is located.
The X-10 repeater from ACT. It is installed into the wall of my utility room
Each X-10 transmission consists of two
identical halves. The CR230 repeater works by decoding the first
half, and then sending out a copy of it which occurs concurrently with
the second half of the transmission. As a result, the signal
strength of the second half is much higher than the first. This
can clearly be seen by my ESM1 X-10
Signal
Strength
Meter. I see a short bar blip on the display
(from the original sender) followed by a long bar (amplified by the
CR230). This is a very distinct signature as all previously seen
signals produce two bars of the same length. It is not known if
the CR230 phase locks onto the 120 KHz signal by the original sender,
but if I were to design this box, I would certainly have done
that. This would ensure that the signals of the CR230 and the
original transmitter are in phase, and would not interfere
destructively.
In my research of the device, I tried to find out if all X-10 receivers would work with just one copy (half) of the full X-10 message. This is because regions in the home that have weak signal would only 'see' one half of the command (the half that was amplified by the CR230). The general consensus on the newsgroups is that reception would work with all devices. Also, Phil Kingery from ACT advised not using both the CR230 and the CP303 in the same installation. I have not found this to be a problem.
In actual testing I have found seamless behavior, and communication over the whole house has improved. There are two particular breakers/zones that are problematic, and initial testing shows this has improved considerably. Further use will show if this is a good permanent solution (see Project log below).
In my research of the device, I tried to find out if all X-10 receivers would work with just one copy (half) of the full X-10 message. This is because regions in the home that have weak signal would only 'see' one half of the command (the half that was amplified by the CR230). The general consensus on the newsgroups is that reception would work with all devices. Also, Phil Kingery from ACT advised not using both the CR230 and the CP303 in the same installation. I have not found this to be a problem.
In actual testing I have found seamless behavior, and communication over the whole house has improved. There are two particular breakers/zones that are problematic, and initial testing shows this has improved considerably. Further use will show if this is a good permanent solution (see Project log below).
Links
- ACT Solutions web site.
- Article
on filtering and blocking.
Project log
- July 2003 - Purchased and installed unit into utility room.
- December 2003 - One particular outlet that is mainly used for
Christmas decorations has always been difficult to control by
X-10. This year communication has improved, but is still not
completely good. This outlet can now be controlled from the main
control system, but not by all controllers in the house. All
other communication problems appear to have been resolved.
Main Home Automation Page