Each X-10 transmission consists of two
identical halves. The CR230 repeater works by decoding the first
half, and then sending out a copy of it which occurs concurrently with
the second half of the transmission. As a result, the signal
strength of the second half is much higher than the first. This
can clearly be seen by my ESM1
X-10
Signal Strength Meter. I see a short bar blip on the display
(from the original sender) followed by a long bar (amplified by the
CR230). This is a very distinct signature as all previously seen
signals produce two bars of the same length. It is not known if
the CR230 phase locks onto the 120 KHz signal by the original sender,
but if I were to design this box, I would certainly have done
that. This would ensure that the signals of the CR230 and the
original transmitter are in phase, and would not interfere
destructively.
In my research of the device, I tried to find out if all X-10 receivers
would work with just one copy (half) of the full X-10 message.
This is because regions in the home that have weak signal would only
'see' one half of the command (the half that was amplified by the
CR230). The general consensus on the newsgroups is that reception
would work with all devices. Also,
Phil
Kingery from ACT advised not using both the CR230 and the
CP303 in the same installation. I have
not found this to be a problem.
In actual testing I have found seamless behavior, and communication
over the whole house has improved. There are two particular
breakers/zones that are problematic, and initial testing shows this has
improved considerably. Further use will show if this is a good
permanent solution (see Project log below).